VS

Home > Skis > Comparison

Compare Nordica Steadfast Skis 2013 VS Dynastar Cham 87 Skis 2013
 
 
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 18 differences and 21 similarities between Nordica Steadfast Skis 2013, Dynastar Cham 87 Skis 2013
 
Specifications
Product ID   277,193 vs   279,031  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Product ID”

Used   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Used”

Skill Range   Advanced-pro vs   Advancedintermediate-expert  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Skill Range”

Shipping Restriction    vs   This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Shipping Restriction”

What Binding is Included?   None vs   N/a  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “What Binding is Included?”

Binding DIN   N/a vs   N/a  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Binding DIN”

Binding Weight Range   N/a vs   N/a  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Binding Weight Range”

Tip/Waist/Tail Widths   132/90/118mm (@ 170cm) vs   109(127/87/103)90mm  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Tip/Waist/Tail Widths”

Ski Gear Intended Use   All Mountain vs   All Mountain  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Ski Gear Intended Use”

Core Material   Wood vs   Wood  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Core Material”

Construction Type   Cap vs   Sidewall  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Construction Type”

Base Material   Sintered vs   Sintered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Base Material”

Tail Profile   Flared vs   Flat  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Tail Profile”

Rocker   Tip Rocker/camber vs   Rocker/camber/rocker  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rocker”

Tip Width   132 (@ 170cm) vs   109(127  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Tip Width”

Waist Width   86-95mm vs   86-95mm  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Waist Width”

Tail Width   118 (@ 170cm) vs   103 (90mm)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Tail Width”

Turn Radius   16-20 vs   16-20  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Turn Radius”

Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length   17m (@ 170cm) vs   16m (@172)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length”

Alpine Touring   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Alpine Touring”

Race   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Race”

Twin Tip   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Twin Tip”

Titanium   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Titanium”

Special Features   Energy Ca I-core Construction, Early Rise Camrock vs   Progressive 5-point Sidecut, Flat Pintail  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Features”

Bindings Included   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Bindings Included”

Model #   None vs   N/a  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model #”

Actual Din Range   N/a vs   N/a  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Actual Din Range”

Recommended Weight Range   N/a vs   N/a  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Recommended Weight Range”

Additional Details    vs   Levitation Profile, Long Rocker Tip, Classic Camber Underfoot, Sandwich Laminate Construction  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Additional Details”

Add Comment about “Specifications

cancel
Description
Description 1    vs   Levitation Profile  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 1”

Description 2    vs   Long Rocker Tip  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 2”

Description 3    vs   Classic Camber Underfoot  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 3”

Description 4    vs   Sandwich Laminate Construction  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 4”

Add Comment about “Description

cancel
General
Brand   Nordica vs   Dynastar  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Brand”

Model Year   2013 vs   2013  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

Gender   Mens vs   Mens  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Gender”

Type   All-mountain Skis (75-90) vs   All-mountain Skis (75-90)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type”

Skill Level   Advanced - Pro vs   Advanced Intermediate - Expert  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Skill Level”

warranty   One Year vs   One Year  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “warranty”

Add Comment about “General

cancel

Compare Nordica Steadfast Skis 2013 vs Dynastar Cham 87 Skis 2013 Skis


Scroll To Top

saved