Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
Specifications
Product ID
273,806
vs
274,559
Used
No
vs
No
Shipping Restriction
This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.
vs
This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.
Core Material
Wood W/ Metal Laminate
vs
Wood W/ Metal Laminate
Construction Type
Cap/sidewall
vs
Sidewall
Base Material
Sintered
vs
Sintered
Tail Profile
Flat
vs
Flat
Rocker
Tip Rocker/camber
vs
Tip Rocker/camber
Tip Width
122 (@172cm)
vs
125 (@170cm)
Waist Width
74 (@172cm)
vs
74 (@170cm)
Tail Width
106 (@172cm)
vs
105 (@170cm)
Turn Radius
16-20
vs
16-20
Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length
16 (@172cm)
vs
16 (@170cm)
Alpine Touring
No
vs
No
Race
No
vs
No
Twin Tip
No
vs
No
Titanium
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Features
Rox Technology, Carbon Web
vs
Power Turn Rocker, Wood/ti/basalt Core
Bindings Included
Yes
vs
Yes
Model #
K2/marker Mx 12.0
vs
Axial 2 120
Actual Din Range
3-12
vs
4-12
Recommended Weight Range
120-220 Lbs
vs
110-210 Lbs
Additional Details
Rox Technology, Carbon Web Construction, Mod Technology, Mod Monic Dampening System, Aspen/paulownia Wood Core With Metal Laminate, 70% Groomed/ 30% Ungroomed
vs
Powerturn Rocker, Vas Ti/basalt Dampening, Ips Diamond Technology, H Technology, Oversize Sidecut
General
Brand
K2
vs
Rossignol
Model Year
2013
vs
2013
Gender
Mens
vs
Mens
Type
Frontside Skis
vs
Frontside Skis
Skill Level
Advanced - Pro
vs
Advanced Intermediate - Expert
warranty
One Year
vs
Two Years
Compare K2 A.M.P. Charger Skis 2013 vs Rossignol Pursuit 16 Skis 2013 Skis
cancel