Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
Specifications
Product ID
268,026
vs
274,630
Used
No
vs
No
Shipping Restriction
vs
This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.
Type
Frontside Skis
vs
Core Material
Composite
vs
Wood & Composite
Construction Type
Cap
vs
Cap
Base Material
Extruded
vs
Sintered
Tail Profile
Flared
vs
Flared
Rocker
Tip Rocker/camber
vs
Rocker/camber/rocker
Tip Width
117
vs
121 (@156cm)
Waist Width
73
vs
76 (@156cm)
Tail Width
102
vs
111 (@156cm)
Turn Radius
11-15
vs
11-15
Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length
12.4 (@ 152cm)
vs
15.2 (@166cm)
Alpine Touring
No
vs
No
Race
No
vs
No
Twin Tip
No
vs
No
Titanium
No
vs
No
Special Features
Quick Trick Integration, Express Technology
vs
Auto Turn Rocker, Extended Sidecut
Bindings Included
Yes
vs
Yes
Model #
Qt Elw 9
vs
Xelium Saphir 100 L
Actual Din Range
2.5-9
vs
2-10
Recommended Weight Range
vs
80-180 Lbs
Additional Details
Express Technology For Better Transfer Of Energy To The Edges, Full Power Cap Enhances Torsional Stiffness For Better Edge Hold, Quick Trick Integration For Light Weight Performance
vs
Auto Turn Rocker, Extended Sidecut, Rossitop Cap Construction
General
Brand
Elan
vs
Rossignol
Model Year
2012
vs
2013
Gender
Womens
vs
Womens
Type
vs
All-mountain Skis
Skill Level
Beginner - Intermediate
vs
Beginner - Advanced Intermediate
warranty
One Year
vs
Two Years
Compare Elan Zest QT Womens Skis 2012 vs Rossignol Temptation 76 Womens Skis 2013 Skis
cancel