Home > Skis > Comparison

Compare	Atomic Panic Skis 2013	VS	Fischer RC 4 World Cup SL Med Race Skis 2013

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

There are 22 differences and 15 similarities between Atomic Panic Skis 2013, Fischer RC 4 World Cup SL Med Race Skis 2013

Specifications
Product ID		275,762	vs	278,229
	[X] Add Comment about “Product ID”
Used		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Used”
Skill Range		Intermediate-advanced	vs	Expert-pro
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Range”
What Binding is Included?		None	vs	None
	[X] Add Comment about “What Binding is Included?”
Binding DIN		N/a	vs	N/a
	[X] Add Comment about “Binding DIN”
Binding Weight Range		N/a	vs	N/a
	[X] Add Comment about “Binding Weight Range”
Tip/Waist/Tail Widths		123/87/113.5 (@173cm)	vs	Complies To 2013 Fis Regulations
	[X] Add Comment about “Tip/Waist/Tail Widths”
Ski Gear Intended Use		All Mountain	vs	Race
	[X] Add Comment about “Ski Gear Intended Use”
Core Material		Wood	vs	Wood W/ Metal Laminate
	[X] Add Comment about “Core Material”
Construction Type		Cap/sidewall	vs	Sidewall
	[X] Add Comment about “Construction Type”
Base Material		Sintered	vs	Sintered
	[X] Add Comment about “Base Material”
Tail Profile		Twin	vs	Flat
	[X] Add Comment about “Tail Profile”
Rocker		Rocker/camber/rocker	vs	Camber
	[X] Add Comment about “Rocker”
Tip Width		123 (@173cm)	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Tip Width”
Waist Width		86-95mm	vs	60-69mm
	[X] Add Comment about “Waist Width”
Tail Width		113.5 (@173cm)	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Tail Width”
Turn Radius		16-20	vs	11-15
	[X] Add Comment about “Turn Radius”
Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length		18m (@173)	vs	Complies To 2013 Fis Regulations
	[X] Add Comment about “Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length”
Alpine Touring		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Alpine Touring”
Race		No	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Race”
Twin Tip		Yes	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Twin Tip”
Titanium		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Titanium”
Special Features		Step Down Sidewall, All Mountain Rocker	vs	Complies To 2013 Fis Regulations, Hole Ski Technology
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Features”
Bindings Included		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Bindings Included”
Model #		None	vs	None
	[X] Add Comment about “Model #”
Actual Din Range		N/a	vs	N/a
	[X] Add Comment about “Actual Din Range”
Recommended Weight Range		N/a	vs	N/a
	[X] Add Comment about “Recommended Weight Range”
Additional Details		Step Down Sidewall, All Mountain Rocker, Wood Core	vs	Recommended Binding Is Fischer Rc4 Z 17 Freeflex, Hole Ski Technology, Complies To 2013 Fis Regulations
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Details”

Description
Description 1		Step Down Sidewall	vs	Recommended Binding Is Fischer Rc4 Z 17 Freeflex
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 1”
Description 2		All Mountain Rocker	vs	Hole Ski Technology
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 2”
Description 3		Wood Core	vs	Complies To 2013 Fis Regulations
	[X] Add Comment about “Description 3”

General
Brand		Atomic	vs	Fischer
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Model Year		2013	vs	2013
	[X] Add Comment about “Model Year”
Gender		Mens	vs	Mens
	[X] Add Comment about “Gender”
Type		All-mountain Skis (75-90)	vs	Race Skis
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Skill Level		Intermediate - Advanced	vs	Advanced - Pro
	[X] Add Comment about “Skill Level”
warranty		One Year	vs	One Year
	[X] Add Comment about “warranty”